The platform for tracking and understanding East Asia macro
Today's official PMIs ticked up, but not by enough to clear market concern about the strength of the cycle caused by the weak IP, retail sales and FAI data of the last couple of months.
My latest video, making the case for a bottoming of China's economy. In light of this week's poor official data, the argument might look off-base, which means it should at least be interesting. I do think the logic holds up, but as discussed here, there are reasons I could be wrong.
I have been arguing that the underlying economy has been stabilising, with prices bottoming out before the Iran war. But stabilisation is external-led, and today's data show the domestic cycle remains a mess. That will likely become a policy issue if IP doesn't stay at an annualised run-rate of 5%
The rise in PPI that continued in May is of macro significance: it is pushing up industrial sector earnings, and the GDP deflator will likely turn positive in Q2. But it is difficult to find signs of domestically generated inflation that would suggest a real upturn in the economy.
Chips rather than energy have been the bigger driver of trade patterns this year. That's true for exports and imports, though there are other drivers of both reaching record highs in May: autos for exports, ores and likely gold for imports. Despite the rise in imports, the trade surplus remains big.
In today's official data, headline PMIs for both manufacturing and services remain around 50. The details of the manufacturing PMI don't suggest much Middle East disruption. The run-up in prices that pre-dated Iran is, however, sustaining. On the other hand, employment remains weak.
The bounce in headline profits in April was largely base effect, but there are signs of underlying improvement: revenues have started to rise, the increase in PPI is boosting profits in heavy industry, and hasn't yet derailed the post-2024 increase in total downstream manufacturing earnings.
The surge in semiconductor exports that is such an import theme across the region is also an important dynamic in China. But in China, the semiconductor trade has broader implications: for the trade surplus, import demand, the export outlook, and inflation, both in the region and ROW.
Most of the headline activity data in April weakened, with goods retail sales being particularly bad. So, clearly no macro recovery. But services retail sales picked up, and the stability in home sales and household liquidity preference, and firmer pricing, continue to suggest broad stabilisation.
The big trade story this year is the sudden rise in imports. There are some signs of firmer domestic demand. But 80% of the increase is from two categories alone: precious metals and semiconductors. And most of the semi strength is volumes, which is puzzling when global IC prices are rising so much.
PPI inflation accelerated again in April, and with CPI inflation firm, the GDP deflator is on track to rise in Q2 for the first time in 2022. The turn is being led by energy and commodity prices. There are some signs of a stabilisation in underlying prices too, but so far, they are tentative.
After doing nothing for 3 years, imports are suddenly growing 20%. Chips are one component, but while I thought that related to prices, official data show the bigger diver of overall imports is volumes. I am not sure that's because of domestic demand, but it is starting to reduce the trade surplus.
The three red lines and covid delivered a huge, multi-year blow to the economy. Multiple signs have started to emerge that this hit has been absorbed, and that China macro is stabilising. This suggests that the recent lessening of deflation might prove durable, with broad implications across markets
The broad theme is macro is stabilisation, shown by three indicators that are bottoming after multi-year declines: property starts, household demand deposits, and producer prices. The implications, as are already being seen, are slower rate cuts, stabilising yields, and a stronger currency.
Today's trade data for March don't get us so far: only headline data have been released, and underlying trends are still obscured by Chinese New Year distortions. Overall, however, exports look firm, with auto sales rising again. Imports are very strong, but that is more about chips than energy.
The lessening of deflation has largely been driven by external factors. But domestic monetary developments have helped: the increase in PBC liquidity injections, and as shown again by today's March monetary release, the stabilisation of M1 growth and the M1:M2 ratio.
That the return of PPI inflation in March was driven by an energy price shock isn't positive. In fact, though, the recovery in PPI pre-dates the Iran war, beginning in June last year. Positive inflation reinforces the macro narrative that China's cycle is more stable, supporting rates and the CNY.
The sharp rise in input prices in today's PMIs move China back towards rising YoY PPI for the first time since 2022. Usually, higher prices would boost PMIs too. With the rise in prices externally-driven, that is less likely now. But, I think some inflation does improve the macro cycle for China.
1) Goods and services output growing ~5% is enough for Beijing; 2) money and credit growth don't suggest a lot of change in that underlying trajectory; 3) nominal momentum is improving, with an end of PPI deflation now a real possibility; 4) the likelihood of further monetary easing is falling.
Exports in YoY and SA terms were strong in Jan-Feb. That looks too good to be true, and I'd expect new year distortions won't totally disappear until March. Still, one trend that looks real is the rise in chip exports, as China benefits from the same semi super cycle lifting the rest of the region.
Deflation momentum continued to lessen in February, a trend that will now be given a further boost by global oil prices. But with this shift in the direction of deflation being driven by external factors, it isn't based on the sort of improvement in domestic growth that is needed for sustainability.
The S&P/RatingDog PMIs suggest an economy that is finally recovering. The official PMIs, by contrast, indicate continued sluggishness. I am inclined to think there is no change, at least until the LNY impact fades. The one common theme is firmer input prices, even before an energy price shock.
January fx settlement data suggest large fx intervention for a second consecutive month. One reason is the CA surplus, which other data today show widened in Q4. Another is interest rates which are more stable, even though monetary trends aren't changing much, and property prices continue to fall.
CPI inflation softened in January, but it always does when the new year holiday falls in February. PPI has less seasonal distortion, and rose MoM in January for the second consecutive time. The GDP deflator is likely to improve again in Q1. This is about external factors, but deflation is lessening.
Today's official PMIs were below 50. That shows the domestic economy is weak – though the data were likely pulled down by the coming holiday. More interesting was the further rise in prices in manufacturing. That change relates to USD/global prices, but does suggest an upturn in nominal momentum.