Japan – household incomes still weak
Q2 aggregate consumption was weak because incomes were too. Asset incomes are rising, but wages are soft, and in cash terms, the tax burden has been increasing. But while spending in aggregate terms is constrained, the population is falling, so in per capita terms there is actually recovery.
Japan – manufacturing upturn
The overall impression from all today's releases is continued inflation pressure supported by a stronger mfg cycle. The signs of a fall-off in services momentum, however, bear monitoring, perhaps showing signs that tightening might actually be biting. If so, the implication is a flatter curve.
Japan – stronger inflation
I have been thinking that underlying inflation remains modest compared with headline. That is still true, but today's inflation data were strong. Tankan price measures for all firms were firmer than for large firms alone. And Tokyo September inflation was broad as well as strong.
Japan – faster, but not that fast
The Tankan survey suggests nominal growth stronger at the margin, but not gaining a lot of new momentum. The tone of the summary of opinions of the September meeting looks similar: likely faster rate hikes, but no sense of the sort of urgency that would make October a live meeting.
Japan – FOF trends
Q2 flow of funds: 1) firms remain net savers; 2) the fiscal deficit is under 2% of GDP, and government assets continue to rise; 3) GPIF, foreigners and households are absorbing JGB supply as the BOJ steps back; 4) household equity holdings are up sharply, but mainly because of valuations.
Japan – mfg mini-boom
Defying BOJ fears of a slowdown, this year's surge in corporate profits continued in Q2. The big driver this year has been manufacturing, and today's PMI shows the recovery in the sector isn't over yet. Relative to the strength of profits, capex and wages are sluggish.
Japan – Himino hawkish
Deputy governor Himino's argued today that all the main macro dynamics are pushing up prices, underlying inflation has been rising, and so there is now a risk of "underlying inflation exceeding 2%". Unsurprisingly, he didn't spell out the policy implications, but it does sound quite hawkish, no?