Today's services PPI showed solid underlying inflation. However, the recent rebound in CPI has been driven by food prices, and in separate remarks today, governor Ueda sounded more concerned about those. With a meaningful deal on tariffs, further rate hikes would quickly come back onto the table.
The recent renewed decline in upstream prices is partly about energy, and so will provide some help to manufacturers. However, in a sign of the continued weakness of construction, building material prices have also dropped, and the acceleration in PPI deflation is rarely a good sign for the cycle.
A summary of what happened on East Asia Econ last week, and what to look for in the next seven days.
Today's data show that, unlike Japan, Korean PPI is following import prices lower. Unsurprisingly, the big moves in the PPI April report were in energy prices, which fell 7.9% YoY. With the KRW also strengthening, the BOK from here should be able to focus even more on the weakness in growth.
BOJ core rose again in April, boosted by goods, keeping in place the cost of living squeeze that is feeding into declining sentiment. My measure of core services price inflation continues to run a bit under 2%. That's ok, but the drop in sentiment has clearly shifted risks to the downside.
After a tick-up in mid-2024, unemployment is back at 3.4%, the lowest in 25 years. In Korea, low UE is offset by big supply-side shifts as the participation rate rises. That isn't happening in Taiwan, so the labour market really is tight, with the big risk being tariffs cause export recession.
March machine orders surged, which could be tariff-related, but the strength was in domestic not foreign orders. Anyway, it seems unlikely to last, with today's flash May PMI repeating the downbeat message of the EW, with business confidence "the second-lowest recorded" since 2020.
Data today don't darken the price- and tariff-driven pessimism painted by the April EW survey. In the May Reuters Tankan, non-manufacturing sentiment was firm, supported in part by record tourist inflows. Manufacturing sentiment didn't drop further, and separately, export volumes for April rose.
Historically, in terms of both savings and inflation, Korea has looked different from the other East Asian economies. But that is now changing. In recent years, Korea has become a clear external creditor, and labour market developments warn of a structural slowdown in inflation.
After adjusting for days worked, Korea's exports in the first 20 days of May fell YoY for the second consecutive month. But this isn't a tariff shock: in level terms, exports peaked back in mid-2024. If anything, May was a bit stronger, led by a rebound in semiconductor shipments.
This year's surge in export orders continued in April, but the drop in the diffusion is warning of a pullback. For the current account, the strength in exports this year has been offset by rising imports and a smaller income surplus. For the TWD, export inflows have been offset by equity outflows.
Headline YoY data are still benefiting from the Q4 pick-up, meaning another 5% growth quarter is likely. But sequentially, growth is slowing again, with no sign of any turnaround in construction that might put a sustainable floor under the overall economy.
After a clear improvement from September, property price deflation since December has settled at an annualised pace of around -1.5%. Sluggish mortgage lending isn't pointing to a further recovery from here. On these official data, average prices are now down 6% from the peak in 2021.
A summary of what happened on East Asia Econ last week, and what to look for in the next seven days.
The details of today's GDP release were decent, with capex and consumption per capita ticking up. Ordinarily, those details would matter more than the slight export-driven QoQ decline in GDP. But the fall is worrying, with the recent drop in sentiment surveys warning of a bigger decline ahead.
YoY import prices are falling everywhere. The implications are mixed. It is contributing to a drop in PPI inflation in Korea, but an intensification of deflation in China. In Japan, meanwhile, PPI inflation remains elevated, supported by the cumulative rise in import prices of recent years.
A video bringing together the arguments I have been making for the last few months on how the economic factors that that helped anchor the TWD in its tight 28-33 range from the late 1990s are now changing.
Today's monetary data continue to suggest that the economy has bottomed, but don't point to a big recovery. Non-state and mortgage lending have stopped deteriorating, but don't show signs of the sort of recovery that would lift economic activity.
Optimistically, you could argue that the sharper drop in upstream prices though May is driven by the falling global oil price, a decline that is good news for China. But the details show the prices of other products are dropping too, and the upshot will be a yet faster pace of PPI deflation.
Unemployment remains low, but wage growth isn't accelerating. The reason is the big structural changes in the labour market of recent years, which have increased the number of part-time jobs. That shift is likely to reduce the bargaining power of labour, and generate a structural slowdown in wages.
The gap between PPI and import prices is a useful way of thinking about inflation and the BOJ. Usually, the gap is closed as import prices are cut by a combination of global recession and JPY strength. If neither happens, PPI inflation isn't likely to recede, and BOJ hikes will remain on the table.
Tariffs are reinforcing the hit from rising prices, causing a sharp fall in corporate confidence in the April EW survey. Household sentiment was stable, but USDJPY rising back to 150 means downside risk. That keeps rate hikes on the agenda, though the BOJ would clearly like tariffs to fall first.
A key component of the structural shift in the economy is rising wages. That continued in March, with signs of another acceleration in manufacturing wage growth on the back of strong exports. As a result, overall wage growth is once again over 3%, as quick as during the recovery out of covid.
The market sees TWD moves as a function of US pressure and lifers. The CBC says it is all about exporters. I see a step-change in exports from 2020 that has ended deflation and exacerbated the CA surplus. The TWD consequences of that shift are stronger if US tariffs don't trigger a global recession.
Today's 10D May export data were stable, but that won't ease the growth concerns visible in last week's minutes of the BOK April meeting. It seems the member who voted for a cut was weighing more than 25bp. But another member warned against being "bold", saying that monetary easing wasn't working.